World Inequality Lab researchers note that this period coincides with the rollback in these countries and regions of various post-World War II policies aimed at narrowing economic divides. This example makes it clear that these countries would not be able to improve from this miserable condition without help.
Wealthy nations should provide local governments with aid and guidance to offer their nation with better life standards. And these figures only cover theft through trade in goods. And so it becomes an obligation on richer countries to provide the affected areas not only short-term aid like health expertise but also to help with better food and education in order for those countries to handle and control future outbreaks.
The data can be downloaded from here.
Although their share of global income has declined somewhat since the financial crisis, at more than 20 percent it is still much higher than their 16 percent share in On the other hand, the main reason why people favour the idea not to share their wealth with others is that it would mean the end of colonisation worldwide.
In conclusion, my personal view about charity and aid to poor nations is a responsibility of both parts. For above, it can be concluded that in order to maintain its position, the government of needy nations should be concerned towards satisfying the needs of its citizens.
The Indian government has to come out with policies to promote innovation in agriculture so as to be able to be self-sufficient eventually. Americans have access to health care.
I get that. One problem that can be solved with cash is lack of income.